Bay Area financial planning, Beneficiaries, Brian Damiani, conservatorship, disabled child, estate planning, financial planning, health care reform, IRA, married couple, pleasanton financial planner, retirement planning, Wealth Management Associates
If you do, there are some “minor concerns” to keep in mind.
Should you make a minor child the primary beneficiary of your IRA? Are there any caveats to that choice?
IRA owners frequently name young children as contingent beneficiaries of their accounts, but designating someone younger than 18 as the primary beneficiary of IRA assets invites a number of questions.
Will you exploit the stretch IRA strategy? Some parents name a child or grandchild as an IRA beneficiary because it just seems like a good thing to do … without realizing that it could be one of the greatest things they could do to promote lifetime wealth for that person.
If you have plenty of retirement funds apart from your IRA, you may want to consider making your IRA a vehicle to provide for your heirs. The stretch IRA strategy could be a gateway to decades of tax-deferred growth for those IRA assets.
When owners of traditional or Roth IRAs die, their beneficiaries have three choices. They can either a) withdraw the money as a taxable lump sum, b) create their own inherited IRA that must be emptied within five years of the original IRA owner’s death, or c) leave the IRA in the name of the deceased owner, and then begin taking Required Minimum Distributions based upon the beneficiary’s age. In this way, RMDs may be stretched over an heir’s lifetime, and the remaining invested assets retain their potential for tax-deferred growth.1,2
This last option is the core of the stretch IRA strategy. If the IRA custodian allows, the IRA beneficiary can designate a second-generation beneficiary, the second-generation beneficiary can designate a third-generation beneficiary, and so forth. As long as RMDs are properly made by the beneficiaries, the IRA assets can keep growing, perhaps for generations.
The stretch IRA strategy is relatively flexible. In most instances, a non-spousal IRA beneficiary can elect to quit stretching the assets at any time by taking the whole remaining balance of the inherited IRA as a distribution. (Some IRA inheritors do run into situations where they need to withdraw more than their RMD.)3
What if multiple children are named as primary IRA beneficiaries? This is entirely permissible. If that is the case, then all of their RMDs will be calculated based on the age of the oldest child. Alternately, if the inherited IRA is split into separate inherited IRAs by December 31st of the year after your death, then each of your children may use their own life expectancy to calculate RMDs.4,5
What if a minor child inherits an IRA? If the IRA has more than a few thousand dollars in it, then one of two responses may be necessary. If one or both parents are still alive, then they will need to petition a probate court to be appointed guardians of the money. If the child’s parents are deceased, then the probate court may appoint a guardian. If you don’t want to risk any of this happening, you have the authority to appoint a custodian for the IRA per the federal Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA), which 48 of 50 states recognize. This adult custodian can be named as the IRA beneficiary and will gain the authority to manage the IRA assets.1,5
Keep in mind that the child is free to control and potentially liquidate that IRA at age 18 or 21 (it varies per state and whether or not a custodian has been appointed as an IRA beneficiary).1,6
Should you set up a family IRA trust? If you want more control, instead of naming a child as the primary beneficiary of your IRA, you could a) name a qualified see-through trust as the primary IRA beneficiary and b) name the child as the primary beneficiary of that trust.
When you pass away, a) the balance in your IRA is then transferred to an inherited IRA, b) RMDs are paid from the IRA into the trust, and then c) payments are made to the trust beneficiary. This way, you can see that the IRA account balance is paid out over an extended number of years, lessening the risk of the child spending the money all at once. If a trust is designated as a primary IRA beneficiary, the resulting RMDs will be based on the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary minus one year.1,2,4
There is a definite downside to this. The trust beneficiary (your child) can’t subsequently roll over the trust assets into an IRA and name his or her own beneficiaries. So this is basically “the end of the trail” for a stretch IRA strategy. The payments out of the trust to the trust beneficiary are fully taxable, presuming they are simply passed through the trust to the beneficiary.2
Who would oversee such a trust if the child’s parents die? A family IRA trust should name a successor trustee. Assuming a parent is named as trustee, the successor trustee (commonly a younger, financially literate relative) can become the trustee. If a bank, trust company or attorney is the named trustee, they will name a successor trustee. There is nothing preventing a custodian appointed as a trust beneficiary per UTMA from being named as a successor trustee.1,7
How will the RMDs be handled? Again, the named primary beneficiary has three options: a lump sum payout (fully taxable), RMDs based on life expectancy (the stretch IRA option), or creating their own inherited IRA that must be emptied within five years of the original IRA owner’s death (an option available if the original IRA owner passes away prior to age 70½).7
Assuming the stretch IRA strategy is chosen by the beneficiary, the younger the primary beneficiary is, the smaller the RMDs will be (per the relevant IRS life expectancy tables).
If you have not created a family IRA trust, then the primary beneficiary of your IRA will have full control of the IRA assets after your death. It is entirely up to the primary beneficiary to choose or reject a stretch IRA option.7
What if you are unsure about naming a minor child as a contingent IRA beneficiary? You could opt to incorporate a disclaimer provision into your beneficiary designations. This will allow the primary beneficiary of the IRA (presumably, your spouse) the option to disclaim his or her interest in the assets, so that they may be claimed by one or more contingent beneficiaries. In this way, you give your spouse (or whoever is the primary beneficiary) a chance to reconsider the initial vision for the inheritance of the IRA assets.8
Lastly, if you name a minor child as your primary IRA beneficiary, you should strive to see that he or she gets professional guidance for the invested assets and that the IRA is administered properly over the years.
This material was prepared by MarketingLibrary.Net Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please note – investing involves risk, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty. This is neither a solicitation nor recommendation to purchase or sell any investment or insurance product or service, and should not be relied upon as such. All indices are unmanaged and are not illustrative of any particular investment.
5 – fa.smithbarney.com/public/projectfiles/9ecae891-2c7b-4eef-985f-b65412c55589.pdf [9/10]
6 – smith-condeni.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=74&Itemid=5 [1/31/13]